Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today
See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.
Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.
How to use this page
[edit]- Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
- Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
- Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
- Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
- Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
- Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
- If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
- Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
- Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
- Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
- Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
- Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.
Special notes
[edit]Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.
Discussion for Today
[edit]- This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024_November_19
November 19
[edit]NEW NOMINATIONS
[edit]Category:Gardening books
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:Gardening books to Category:Books about gardening
- Nominator's rationale: I suggest renaming to use 'about', per parent Category:Works about gardening. This variant is more clear. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If there's no opposition this should be fine but let's give it one more pass first.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 23:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Confederation of the Rhine
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:1806 in Germany to Category:1806 in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1806 establishments in Germany to Category:1806 establishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1806 disestablishments in Germany to Category:1806 disestablishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1807 in Germany to Category:1807 in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1807 establishments in Germany to Category:1807 establishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1807 disestablishments in Germany to Category:1807 disestablishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1808 in Germany to Category:1808 in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1808 establishments in Germany to Category:1808 establishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1808 disestablishments in Germany to Category:1808 disestablishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1809 in Germany to Category:1809 in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1809 establishments in Germany to Category:1809 establishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1809 disestablishments in Germany to Category:1809 disestablishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1810 in Germany to Category:1810 in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1810 establishments in Germany to Category:1810 establishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1810 disestablishments in Germany to Category:1810 disestablishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1811 in Germany to Category:1811 in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1811 establishments in Germany to Category:1811 establishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1811 disestablishments in Germany to Category:1811 disestablishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1812 in Germany to Category:1812 in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1812 establishments in Germany to Category:1812 establishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1812 disestablishments in Germany to Category:1812 disestablishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1813 in Germany to Category:1813 in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1813 establishments in Germany to Category:1813 establishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Propose renaming Category:1813 disestablishments in Germany to Category:1813 disestablishments in the Confederation of the Rhine
- Nominator's rationale: rename and purge, from 1806 to 1813 Germany was called Confederation of the Rhine but it did not include Austria and Prussia. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- If approved then redirect them all, to aid navigation. But I am not sure that precision is helpful for such short time spans. – Fayenatic London 21:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Redirecting is a good idea. We already have Category:Confederation of the Rhine so the proposal is consistent with that. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Large nomination; allowing extra time for objections.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Category:Confederation of the Rhine already contains all the nominated categories, so renaming will not change the parenting and, while technically correct, IMHO it would be unnecessary. – Fayenatic London 12:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Rename and purge with redirects per nom. It is a short timespan, but we should strive to be as accurate as possible. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:11, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to gather more participation and resolve concerns about precision being unnecessary.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 23:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:20th-century explorers from the Russian Empire
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Was opposed at speedy by
@Altenmann: by the creatora similarly named user, in spite of the fact that there is no other category in Category:20th-century Russian people by occupation that uses the Russian Empire naming convention SMasonGarrison 20:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose a valid subcategory of Category:Explorers from the Russian Empire <-- category:Explorers by former country. Not to say that "Russian explorers" is an ambiguous term, because in 20th century there were two thoroughly different Russian states: Russian Empire and Russia, wide apart in time. Not to say about RSFSR --Altenmann >talk 21:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Again, how does this address the fact that no other category in the Category:20th-century Russian people tree uses this convention? What makes the unambiguous Category:Russian explorers the exception? For the record, if this change stays, it's going to continue to not mesh with the rest of the Fooian occupation template headers. SMasonGarrison 02:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is because the templated/automated categorization is screwed up.
- There is a whole Category:19th-century people from the Russian Empire by occupation
- Therefore there must be Category:20th-century people from the Russian Empire by occupation
- And we have to add missing tree, not delete valid categories. on bureaucratric reasons. --Altenmann >talk 03:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please wait until this CFD is settled. Your category creations are going to break the current version of the underlying template. Please be patient. There is a very long history of this category tree that only carved out two centuries for the Russian empire. Category:20th-century_people_from_the_Russian_Empire was merged and redirected into [1] Category:20th-century_Russian people_from_the_Russian_Empire by @Fayenatic london: and Category:20th-century Russian monarchs isn't Category:20th-century_Russian monarchs_from_the_Russian_Empire SMasonGarrison 04:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- So you are saying you created a faulty template and now trying to delete a category that does not fit it? How typical of software developer: "it is not a bug, it is a feature". --Altenmann >talk 18:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please keep it civil. I've asked you to be patient, and even said that I'd modify the template if the category was kept. Insulting me, and saying that I shouldn't be editing in this area because of my profession is not in the spirit of wikipedia.SMasonGarrison 23:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC
- Because of your profession I was expecting you behave professionally, rather than revert warring on category you do not own. Good bye, do whatever you want, with cosmonauts placed in the category of Russian Empire. If you do not understand how idiotic it looks, I no longer wish to communicate with you. --Altenmann >talk 00:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please keep it civil. I've asked you to be patient, and even said that I'd modify the template if the category was kept. Insulting me, and saying that I shouldn't be editing in this area because of my profession is not in the spirit of wikipedia.SMasonGarrison 23:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC
- So you are saying you created a faulty template and now trying to delete a category that does not fit it? How typical of software developer: "it is not a bug, it is a feature". --Altenmann >talk 18:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please wait until this CFD is settled. Your category creations are going to break the current version of the underlying template. Please be patient. There is a very long history of this category tree that only carved out two centuries for the Russian empire. Category:20th-century_people_from_the_Russian_Empire was merged and redirected into [1] Category:20th-century_Russian people_from_the_Russian_Empire by @Fayenatic london: and Category:20th-century Russian monarchs isn't Category:20th-century_Russian monarchs_from_the_Russian_Empire SMasonGarrison 04:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Again, how does this address the fact that no other category in the Category:20th-century Russian people tree uses this convention? What makes the unambiguous Category:Russian explorers the exception? For the record, if this change stays, it's going to continue to not mesh with the rest of the Fooian occupation template headers. SMasonGarrison 02:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- If kept, heavily purge, these are mostly Soviet explorers. There is even an American explorer in this category, Carl von Hoffman. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Someone screwed up the contents of this category recently. Last time I looked it had only 8 entries. And now someone added Boris Andreyev (cosmonaut) into it (cosmonauts in the Russian Empire: alt-history sci-fi :-). --Altenmann >talk 18:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Someone" appears to be the nominator. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. I'm adding the relevant Russian pages per the concern raised at speedy about the contents. If the category is kept as currently named, I'd support purging. @Altenmann I think you need to review: WP:BATTLE, based on your comments on my talk page User talk:Smasongarrison#Please revert all some of your changes. SMasonGarrison 23:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Someone" appears to be the nominator. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Someone screwed up the contents of this category recently. Last time I looked it had only 8 entries. And now someone added Boris Andreyev (cosmonaut) into it (cosmonauts in the Russian Empire: alt-history sci-fi :-). --Altenmann >talk 18:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Rename as nominated. The category as named covers a very short period of time, from 1900 to 1917. Russian existed through the twentieth century because there was the RSFSR, and, during the Soviet period, Russian is a subcategory of Soviet . Robert McClenon (talk) 23:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 23:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Puerto Rico Adjutant Generals
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:Puerto Rico Adjutant Generals to Category:Puerto Rico Adjutants General
- Nominator's rationale: Correct plural per Category:Adjutants general of the National Guard of the United States StAnselm (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 23:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Olympic football venues
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCVENUE. Content is already better shared at List of Olympic venues in football. User:Namiba 15:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Ministers for the Arts (Victoria)
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Ministries are the same portfolio just a different name. GMH Melbourne (talk) 03:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- I believe these typically follow the format of Category:Ministers for creative industries of Victoria, based on a number of similarly named categories at Category:Government ministers by country and MOS:JOBTITLES. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Postmasters general of Australia
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:Postmasters general of Australia to Category:Postmasters-General of Australia
- Nominator's rationale: Correct capitalisation per Postmaster-General's Department article. StAnselm (talk) 02:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support: consistent with the corresponding article. GMH Melbourne (talk) 02:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Looking at the category's page history there seems to be a lot of going back and forth with the capitalision. GMH Melbourne (talk) 02:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Not back and forth, it was one-directional, the parent category has been moved too. The reasoning was, I think, that the article is about the office while the category is about people (I am not the best defender of this rename). I guess meanwhile most, if not all, similar categories are without capitalization as well, e.g. article Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Category:Prime ministers of the United Kingdom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural oppose, this requires a broader discussion, it doesn't make sense to only rename this particular category. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Why not? Category:Postmasters general includes offices from many countries, some of which use a hyphen, and some don't. (Of course, that category was moved twice speedily, without any discussion.) StAnselm (talk) 14:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's not about the hyphen but about the capitalization. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well, the hyphen is important too. The rationale for moving the parent cat was "None of the 11 sub categories use a hyphen", but as far as I can tell that simply wasn't true - the hyphen for this category was removed three days later. Would you be OK with Category:Postmasters-general of Australia? StAnselm (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- That would be fine with me. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well, the hyphen is important too. The rationale for moving the parent cat was "None of the 11 sub categories use a hyphen", but as far as I can tell that simply wasn't true - the hyphen for this category was removed three days later. Would you be OK with Category:Postmasters-general of Australia? StAnselm (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Why not? Category:Postmasters general includes offices from many countries, some of which use a hyphen, and some don't. (Of course, that category was moved twice speedily, without any discussion.) StAnselm (talk) 14:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose capitalization, per MOS:JOBTITLES. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Birth control law and case law
[edit]- Propose splitting Category:Birth control law and case law to Category:Birth control law and Category:Birth control case law
- Nominator's rationale: I think we should split this becayuse typically case law is nested under law SMasonGarrison 01:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- There is only one article about a law in the category, do you really suggest making a separate category for it? I think just a rename to the less clunkier Category:Birth control law would suffice. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Films acted by Puneeth Rajkumar
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: We don't create categories for actors unless they wrote, directed or produced. Kailash29792 (talk) 00:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PERFCAT. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)